PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLW vs. CIEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLW vs. CIEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 105.36% return, which is significantly higher than CIEN's 90.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has underperformed CIEN with an annualized return of 27.57%, while CIEN has yielded a comparatively higher 35.80% annualized return.


GLW

1D
1.50%
1M
-6.43%
YTD
105.36%
6M
103.59%
1Y
265.24%
3Y*
79.90%
5Y*
36.42%
10Y*
27.57%

CIEN

1D
0.17%
1M
-19.56%
YTD
90.70%
6M
104.17%
1Y
518.04%
3Y*
119.10%
5Y*
49.92%
10Y*
35.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLW vs. CIEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLW
Corning Incorporated
105.36%87.76%60.64%-1.23%-11.56%5.92%27.57%-1.02%-3.28%34.63%
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
90.70%175.76%88.42%-11.71%-33.77%45.64%23.80%25.89%62.02%-14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GLW and CIEN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 1997

0.44

Over the past year, GLW and CIEN have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLW:

$154.61B

CIEN:

$65.25B

EPS

GLW:

$2.10

CIEN:

$3.01

PE Ratio

GLW:

85.36

CIEN:

148.07

PS Ratio

GLW:

9.47

CIEN:

11.65

PB Ratio

GLW:

13.09

CIEN:

22.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLW:

$16.32B

CIEN:

$5.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLW:

$5.93B

CIEN:

$2.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLW:

$3.77B

CIEN:

$670.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLW vs. CIEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLW
GLW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CIEN
CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLW vs. CIEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLWCIENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.72

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.23

16.49

-5.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.65

76.44

-40.79

GLW vs. CIEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLW Sharpe Ratio is 4.59, which is lower than the CIEN Sharpe Ratio of 7.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLW and CIEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLW vs. CIEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, roughly equal to the maximum CIEN drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and CIEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLWCIENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-99.51%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.01%

-30.68%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-45.51%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-49.54%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.80%

-49.54%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.83%

-57.38%

+43.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.50%

-87.08%

+36.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

6.61%

+0.62%

Volatility

GLW vs. CIEN - Volatility Comparison

Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN) have volatilities of 24.91% and 24.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLWCIENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.91%

24.81%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.66%

56.12%

-5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.33%

66.74%

-10.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.81%

48.55%

-12.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.86%

44.35%

-10.49%

Dividends

GLW vs. CIEN - Dividend Comparison

GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while CIEN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLW
Corning Incorporated
0.63%1.28%2.36%3.68%3.38%2.58%2.44%2.75%2.38%1.94%2.22%2.63%

Financials

GLW vs. CIEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Ciena Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.14B
1.57B
(GLW) Total Revenue
(CIEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GLW vs. CIEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Corning Incorporated and Ciena Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
44.0%
Portfolio components
GLW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

CIEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a gross profit of 691.55M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

GLW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

CIEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported an operating income of 237.87M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

GLW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

CIEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a net income of 218.22M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLW and CIEN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLW has higher volatility (24.91%) compared to CIEN (24.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLW dropped -99.02% vs CIEN's -99.51%.

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.58 vs 4.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLW and CIEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer