GLVAX vs. PGVFX
GLVAX (Invesco Global Focus Fund Class A) and PGVFX (Polaris Global Value Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GLVAX returned 13.10%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for PGVFX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLVAX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PGVFX.
Performance
GLVAX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLVAX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 21.22% return. Over the past 10 years, GLVAX has outperformed PGVFX with an annualized return of 13.10%, while PGVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.80% annualized return.
GLVAX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
PGVFX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 21.22%
- 6M
- 21.44%
- 1Y
- 40.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
GLVAX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLVAX Invesco Global Focus Fund Class A | 10.64% | 14.23% | 20.78% | 36.99% | -37.89% | 3.46% | 56.25% | 31.65% | -10.02% | 25.09% |
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 21.22% | 27.01% | 5.33% | 14.76% | -12.00% | 15.38% | 6.65% | 22.83% | -12.64% | 20.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLVAX and PGVFX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GLVAX and PGVFX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLVAX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank
GLVAX
PGVFX
GLVAX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Focus Fund Class A (GLVAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLVAX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.63 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 4.68 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 16.84 | -11.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLVAX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLVAX drawdown since its inception was -49.69%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLVAX and PGVFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLVAX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.69% | -68.09% | +18.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.24% | -8.76% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -12.53% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.69% | -27.58% | -22.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.69% | -41.26% | -8.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | 0.00% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -11.28% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 2.43% | +2.08% |
Volatility
GLVAX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Focus Fund Class A (GLVAX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 4.22%. This indicates that GLVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLVAX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 4.22% | +4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.04% | 10.16% | +4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 12.27% | +6.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 13.86% | +9.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 15.86% | +6.84% |
GLVAX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLVAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLVAX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison
GLVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.64%, more than PGVFX's 4.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLVAX Invesco Global Focus Fund Class A | 11.64% | 12.87% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 4.56% | 10.03% | 4.26% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 4.27% | 5.17% | 5.65% | 1.68% | 3.55% | 4.05% | 1.55% | 3.69% | 3.39% | 1.50% | 1.32% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLVAX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLVAX has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to PGVFX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLVAX dropped -49.69% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.
PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLVAX and PGVFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer