PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLU vs. FXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLU vs. FXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLU achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GLU has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 7.56%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 0.98% annualized return.


GLU

1D
-0.53%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
0.59%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
7.56%

FXF

1D
-0.13%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
-0.35%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
0.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLU vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLU
The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust
0.59%37.93%23.55%2.07%-28.13%21.19%4.90%25.26%-19.49%34.92%
FXF
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust
-2.44%14.04%-7.46%9.63%-2.29%-4.08%8.18%0.32%-2.01%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GLU and FXF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006

0.06

The correlation between GLU and FXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLU vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLU
GLU Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FXF
FXF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLU vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLUFXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.00

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

-0.06

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

-0.14

+3.83

GLU vs. FXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the FXF Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLU and FXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLU vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLU drawdown since its inception was -50.52%, which is greater than FXF's maximum drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLU and FXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLUFXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.52%

-35.58%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-6.12%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-8.52%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

-11.99%

-25.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

-15.04%

-31.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

-20.36%

+9.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-20.83%

+11.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

2.41%

+2.60%

Volatility

GLU vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison

The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) at 1.97%. This indicates that GLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLUFXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

1.97%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

5.65%

+7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

7.48%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

8.32%

+10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

7.57%

+14.23%

Dividends

GLU vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison

GLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXF
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLU
The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust
6.72%6.23%8.00%9.10%8.52%5.70%6.51%6.36%7.45%5.63%7.14%7.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLU and FXF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLU has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to FXF (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLU dropped -50.52% vs FXF's -35.58%.

GLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLU and FXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer