GLU vs. GM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLU (The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust) and GM (General Motors Company) are both stocks. GLU operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while GM operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GLU returned 7.56%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for GM. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GLU vs. GM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and General Motors Company (GM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLU achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than GM's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GLU has underperformed GM with an annualized return of 7.56%, while GM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.

GLU

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: -0.66%
• 1Y: 18.42%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

GM

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: -2.47%
• 6M: -4.16%
• 1Y: 64.21%
• 3Y*: 31.04%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLU vs. GM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLU The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust	0.59%	37.93%	23.55%	2.07%	-28.13%	21.19%	4.90%	25.26%	-19.49%	34.92%
GM General Motors Company	-2.47%	54.24%	49.84%	7.92%	-42.36%	40.80%	15.16%	14.02%	-15.06%	22.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GLU and GM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010	0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap GLU : $112.26M GM : $72.59B
EPS GLU : $4.81 GM : $2.68
PE Ratio GLU : 3.90 GM : 29.46
PS Ratio GLU : 8.30 GM : 0.41
PB Ratio GLU : 1.02 GM : 1.16
Total Revenue (TTM) GLU : $13.53M GM : $184.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) GLU : $9.73M GM : $11.25B
EBITDA (TTM) GLU : $19.11M GM : $13.56B

Return for Risk

GLU vs. GM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLU

GLU Risk / Return Rank: 73
GLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GLU Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GLU Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GM

GM Risk / Return Rank: 87
GM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
GM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLU vs. GM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and General Motors Company (GM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLU	GM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.84	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.77	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.36	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	4.03	-2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	9.83	-6.15

GLU vs. GM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the GM Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLU and GM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLU vs. GM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLU drawdown since its inception was -50.52%, smaller than the maximum GM drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLU and GM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLU	GM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.52%	-59.96%	+9.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	-16.00%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	-34.02%	+15.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	-58.96%	+21.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.57%	-59.96%	+13.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.31%	-8.19%	-3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.75%	-21.48%	+11.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	6.55%	-1.54%

Volatility

GLU vs. GM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) is 5.03%, while General Motors Company (GM) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that GLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLU	GM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	10.75%	-5.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	24.36%	-11.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	35.13%	-20.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.19%	36.71%	-17.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	36.97%	-15.17%

Dividends

GLU vs. GM - Dividend Comparison

GLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than GM's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLU The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust	6.72%	6.23%	8.00%	9.10%	8.52%	5.70%	6.51%	6.36%	7.45%	5.63%	7.14%	7.22%
GM General Motors Company	0.84%	0.70%	0.90%	1.00%	0.54%	0.00%	0.91%	4.15%	4.54%	3.71%	4.36%	4.06%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLU and GM in my portfolio?

GLU and GM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLU or GM?

GM has higher volatility (10.75%) compared to GLU (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLU dropped -50.52% vs GM's -59.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.