GLU vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLU or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between GLU and UTF is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GLU vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLU:
1.64
UTF:
1.45
GLU:
2.25
UTF:
2.14
GLU:
1.30
UTF:
1.25
GLU:
1.05
UTF:
1.34
GLU:
5.92
UTF:
5.46
GLU:
5.17%
UTF:
3.81%
GLU:
18.70%
UTF:
14.34%
GLU:
-50.52%
UTF:
-72.62%
GLU:
-6.70%
UTF:
-5.18%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLU achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GLU has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 5.23%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.
GLU
7.21%
9.17%
10.05%
29.30%
3.45%
5.23%
UTF
2.78%
3.09%
4.64%
21.13%
5.35%
9.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLU vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLU
UTF
GLU vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLU vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
GLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, which matches UTF's 7.63% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLU The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust | 7.56% | 8.00% | 9.10% | 8.52% | 5.70% | 6.51% | 6.36% | 7.45% | 5.63% | 7.14% | 7.22% | 6.17% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.63% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
GLU vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLU drawdown since its inception was -50.52%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLU and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLU vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 3.90%. This indicates that GLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLU vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities