GLU vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLU or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between GLU and UTF is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GLU vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLU:
1.12
UTF:
1.17
GLU:
1.56
UTF:
1.59
GLU:
1.22
UTF:
1.23
GLU:
0.96
UTF:
1.61
GLU:
4.27
UTF:
4.61
GLU:
5.39%
UTF:
4.18%
GLU:
20.54%
UTF:
16.29%
GLU:
-50.52%
UTF:
-72.62%
GLU:
-4.54%
UTF:
-3.13%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLU achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GLU has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 5.34%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.
GLU
9.68%
0.12%
2.69%
23.22%
9.33%
5.34%
UTF
6.36%
-0.99%
1.71%
16.33%
10.48%
9.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLU vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLU
UTF
GLU vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLU vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
GLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, which matches UTF's 7.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLU The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust | 7.49% | 8.00% | 9.10% | 8.52% | 5.70% | 6.51% | 6.36% | 7.45% | 5.63% | 7.14% | 7.22% | 6.17% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.47% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.10% | 7.31% | 10.43% | 8.32% | 6.47% |
Drawdowns
GLU vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLU drawdown since its inception was -50.52%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLU and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLU vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 10.60%. This indicates that GLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLU vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities