GLU vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Performance
GLU vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLU vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLU The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust | 1.04% | 37.93% | 23.55% | 2.07% | -28.13% | 21.19% | 4.90% | 25.26% | -19.49% | 34.92% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 9.32% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Fundamentals
GLU:
$114.69M
UTF:
$2.51B
GLU:
$4.81
UTF:
$6.79
GLU:
3.98
UTF:
3.81
GLU:
0.01
UTF:
0.03
GLU:
8.47
UTF:
6.47
GLU:
1.04
UTF:
0.88
GLU:
$13.53M
UTF:
$387.16M
GLU:
$9.73M
UTF:
$388.42M
GLU:
$19.11M
UTF:
$765.72M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLU achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GLU has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 7.97%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.
GLU
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
UTF
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 10.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLU vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
GLU
UTF
GLU vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLU | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 0.70 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.97 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.14 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 0.99 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 2.24 | +6.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLU | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.70 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.34 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.49 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.44 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLU and UTF is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLU vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
GLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than UTF's 7.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLU The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust | 6.42% | 6.23% | 8.00% | 9.10% | 8.52% | 5.70% | 6.51% | 6.36% | 7.45% | 5.63% | 7.14% | 7.22% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.13% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Drawdowns
GLU vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLU drawdown since its inception was -50.52%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLU and UTF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLU | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.52% | -72.62% | +22.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -11.99% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.34% | -30.28% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.57% | -52.53% | +5.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.91% | -4.42% | -6.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -10.44% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 5.29% | -2.31% |
Volatility
GLU vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 4.56%. This indicates that GLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLU | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 4.56% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 9.43% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 15.70% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 18.51% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 23.38% | -1.64% |
Financials
GLU vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities