GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L
GLTY.L (SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF) and XGLE.L (Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both European Government Bonds funds - GLTY.L tracks the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP while XGLE.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLTY.L returned 283.79%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for XGLE.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLTY.L is traded in GBP, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTY.L achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than XGLE.L's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTY.L has outperformed XGLE.L with an annualized return of 283.79%, while XGLE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.62% annualized return.
GLTY.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- -1.70%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- 73.54%
- 10Y*
- 283.79%
XGLE.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.37%
- 5Y*
- -2.18%
- 10Y*
- 0.62%
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTY.L SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF | -3.21% | 3.10% | -4.48% | 279.86% | 158.03% | 169.82% | 413.90% | 596.36% | 632.13% | 2,267.04% |
XGLE.L Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C | -0.83% | 5.95% | -2.94% | 4.66% | -14.01% | -9.34% | 10.68% | 0.57% | 1.78% | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTY.L and XGLE.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between GLTY.L and XGLE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTY.L
XGLE.L
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTY.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTY.L | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.08 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.57 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 1.27 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTY.L | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 0.46 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | -0.29 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | 0.07 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.24 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum XGLE.L drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTY.L and XGLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTY.L | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -26.78% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.40% | -4.53% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.96% | -6.20% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -20.99% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.61% | -26.78% | +3.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -19.03% | +12.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -10.13% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.03% | +0.76% |
Volatility
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTY.L) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) at 1.99%. This indicates that GLTY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTY.L | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 1.99% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.51% | 4.31% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.94% | 5.57% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 135.35% | 7.50% | +127.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 251.64% | 8.54% | +243.10% |
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLTY.L and XGLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLTY.L vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTY.L nor XGLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTY.L SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 1.74% | 2.72% | 74.77% | 114.99% | 84.01% | 106.35% | 119.69% | 125.98% | 157.59% | 81.07% | 1.87% |
XGLE.L Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTY.L and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTY.L and XGLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
GLTY.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and DWS.
Find the right allocation for GLTY.L and XGLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer