GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTY.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L).

GLTY.L and GLTA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTY.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on May 17, 2012. GLTA.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on Jun 10, 2019. Both GLTY.L and GLTA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTY.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLTY.L SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF	-3.59%	3.10%	-4.48%	279.86%	158.03%	169.82%	413.90%	150.18%
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc	-1.85%	4.99%	-4.18%	3.52%	-25.15%	-5.17%	8.71%	1.44%

Different Trading Currencies

GLTY.L is traded in GBP, while GLTA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLTA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTY.L achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly lower than GLTA.L's -1.85% return.

GLTY.L

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -4.16%
• YTD: -3.59%
• 6M: -0.72%
• 1Y: -1.44%
• 3Y*: -1.32%
• 5Y*: 73.53%
• 10Y*: 284.66%

GLTA.L

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -4.25%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 2.43%
• 3Y*: -0.01%
• 5Y*: -4.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTY.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GLTY.L

SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF

GLTA.L

Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc

Return for Risk

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTY.L

GLTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
GLTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GLTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GLTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GLTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GLTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GLTA.L

GLTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GLTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GLTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GLTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTY.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLTY.L	GLTA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	0.37	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	0.54	-0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.07	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	0.43	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	1.42	-2.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTY.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTY.L and GLTA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLTY.L	GLTA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	0.37	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	-0.46	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	-0.31	+1.14

Correlation

The correlation between GLTY.L and GLTA.L is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLTY.L nor GLTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLTY.L SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF	0.00%	1.74%	2.72%	74.77%	114.99%	84.01%	106.35%	119.69%	125.98%	157.59%	81.07%	1.87%
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum GLTA.L drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTY.L and GLTA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTY.L	GLTA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-36.99%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.51%	-4.85%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.61%	-34.87%	+11.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.94%	-28.83%	+21.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-18.84%	+14.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.48%	+0.62%

Volatility

GLTY.L vs. GLTA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTY.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTY.L	GLTA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	2.94%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.70%	4.26%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.89%	6.49%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	135.35%	10.48%	+124.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	251.59%	10.34%	+241.25%