PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLTS.L is traded in GBP, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTS.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than XGLE.L's -0.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLTS.L having a 0.64% annualized return and XGLE.L not far behind at 0.62%.


GLTS.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.34%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
0.64%

XGLE.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-1.32%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
2.37%
5Y*
-2.18%
10Y*
0.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
0.16%5.40%1.76%3.70%-5.72%-1.91%1.77%1.11%0.41%-0.65%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.83%5.95%-2.94%4.66%-14.01%-9.34%10.68%0.57%1.78%4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTS.L and XGLE.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.44

The correlation between GLTS.L and XGLE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTS.L
GLTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTS.LXGLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.08

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.57

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

1.27

+2.58

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTS.L and XGLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLTS.LXGLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.46

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.29

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.07

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.24

+0.10

Drawdowns

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTS.L drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum XGLE.L drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTS.L and XGLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLTS.LXGLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-26.78%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.22%

-4.53%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.22%

-6.20%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.44%

-20.99%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.18%

-26.78%

+15.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-19.03%

+17.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-10.13%

+8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

2.03%

-1.33%

Volatility

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) is 0.85%, while Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that GLTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLTS.LXGLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

1.99%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

4.31%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

5.57%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

7.50%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.62%

8.54%

-5.92%

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLTS.L and XGLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLTS.L vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison

GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while XGLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
3.64%3.44%2.74%1.30%0.18%0.13%0.46%0.60%0.39%0.52%0.88%0.98%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLTS.L and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLTS.L and XGLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLTS.L and XGLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer