GLTS.L vs. USSC.L
GLTS.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF) and USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTS.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLTS.L returned 0.64%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for USSC.L. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. GLTS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for USSC.L.
Performance
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLTS.L is traded in GBP, while USSC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USSC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTS.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than USSC.L's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTS.L has underperformed USSC.L with an annualized return of 0.64%, while USSC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.
GLTS.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
USSC.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 36.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 0.16% | 5.40% | 1.76% | 3.70% | -5.72% | -1.91% | 1.77% | 1.11% | 0.41% | -0.65% |
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 13.35% | 6.56% | 10.22% | 17.02% | 0.54% | 36.50% | 5.57% | 18.50% | -10.28% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTS.L and USSC.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015 | -0.04 |
The correlation between GLTS.L and USSC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTS.L
USSC.L
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTS.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 5.15 | -3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 17.14 | -13.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTS.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.34 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.52 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.58 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.52 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTS.L drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum USSC.L drawdown of -43.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTS.L and USSC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTS.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -43.40% | +32.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.22% | -7.13% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.22% | -28.91% | +26.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.44% | -28.91% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.18% | -43.40% | +32.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.40% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -7.95% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 2.15% | -1.45% |
Volatility
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) is 0.85%, while SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that GLTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTS.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 3.65% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 10.22% | -8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39% | 15.81% | -13.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 20.60% | -17.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 22.18% | -19.56% |
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTS.L vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison
GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while USSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 3.64% | 3.44% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 0.18% | 0.13% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.88% | 0.98% |
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTS.L and USSC.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLTS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.
GLTS.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while USSC.L is Small Cap Value Equities. GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GLTS.L and 0.30% for USSC.L.
Find the right allocation for GLTS.L and USSC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer