GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L
GLTS.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF) and SPY5.L (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTS.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while SPY5.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLTS.L returned 0.64%/yr vs 16.36%/yr for SPY5.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GLTS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY5.L.
Performance
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLTS.L is traded in GBP, while SPY5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTS.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than SPY5.L's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTS.L has underperformed SPY5.L with an annualized return of 0.64%, while SPY5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.
GLTS.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
SPY5.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 0.16% | 5.40% | 1.76% | 3.70% | -5.72% | -1.91% | 1.77% | 1.11% | 0.41% | -0.65% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.71% | 9.06% | 27.55% | 20.31% | -9.02% | 30.50% | 14.06% | 25.87% | 0.54% | 11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTS.L and SPY5.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012 | -0.03 |
The correlation between GLTS.L and SPY5.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTS.L
SPY5.L
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTS.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.45 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.04 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 13.74 | -9.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTS.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.45 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.97 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.99 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.01 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTS.L drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum SPY5.L drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTS.L and SPY5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTS.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -25.97% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.22% | -7.19% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.22% | -21.10% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.44% | -21.10% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.18% | -25.97% | +14.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.29% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -3.27% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 2.12% | -1.42% |
Volatility
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) is 0.85%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that GLTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTS.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 3.49% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 8.55% | -6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39% | 11.90% | -9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 15.36% | -12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 16.47% | -13.85% |
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLTS.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison
GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than SPY5.L's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 3.64% | 3.44% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 0.18% | 0.13% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.88% | 0.98% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 2.29% | 1.64% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTS.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GLTS.L.
GLTS.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while SPY5.L is S&P 500. GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GLTS.L and 0.09% for SPY5.L.
Find the right allocation for GLTS.L and SPY5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer