GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L
GLTS.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF) and GLTP.L (Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist) are both European Government Bonds funds tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, from State Street and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTS.L returned 0.97%/yr vs -4.53%/yr for GLTP.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLTS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for GLTP.L.
Performance
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLTS.L is traded in GBP, while GLTP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLTP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTS.L achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than GLTP.L's 0.42% return.
GLTS.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.12%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 0.65%
GLTP.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- -4.53%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 1.03% | 5.40% | 1.76% | 3.70% | -5.72% | -1.92% | 1.78% | 0.92% |
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist | 0.42% | 5.35% | -4.39% | 3.50% | -24.95% | -5.40% | 8.70% | 5.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTS.L and GLTP.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GLTS.L and GLTP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTS.L
GLTP.L
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLTS.L | GLTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 0.47 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 1.19 | +3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTS.L drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum GLTP.L drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTS.L and GLTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTS.L | GLTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -37.02% | +25.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.22% | -5.69% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.22% | -7.66% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.44% | -34.89% | +24.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -27.10% | +26.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -18.59% | +16.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 2.26% | -1.54% |
Volatility
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) is 0.65%, while Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that GLTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTS.L | GLTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 1.70% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 5.29% | -3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38% | 6.49% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.10% | 10.57% | -7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.52% | 10.19% | -7.67% |
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLTS.L vs. GLTP.L - Dividend Comparison
GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than GLTP.L's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist | 4.47% | 4.39% | 4.33% | 3.24% | 1.62% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 3.61% | 3.44% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 0.18% | 0.13% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.88% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTS.L and GLTP.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLTP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GLTS.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GLTS.L and 0.06% for GLTP.L.
Find the right allocation for GLTS.L and GLTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer