GLTS.L vs. CE01.L
GLTS.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF) and CE01.L (iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both European Government Bonds funds - GLTS.L tracks the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP while CE01.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLTS.L returned 0.64%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CE01.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLTS.L is traded in GBP, while CE01.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CE01.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTS.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than CE01.L's -1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTS.L has underperformed CE01.L with an annualized return of 0.64%, while CE01.L has yielded a comparatively higher 0.80% annualized return.
GLTS.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
CE01.L
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.80%
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 0.16% | 5.40% | 1.76% | 3.70% | -5.72% | -1.91% | 1.77% | 1.11% | 0.41% | -0.65% |
CE01.L iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.14% | 6.87% | -3.53% | 6.60% | -15.38% | -9.55% | 10.06% | 1.33% | 2.06% | 4.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTS.L and CE01.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GLTS.L and CE01.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTS.L
CE01.L
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTS.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.08 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.50 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 1.18 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTS.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.45 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | -0.27 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.09 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.18 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTS.L drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum CE01.L drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTS.L and CE01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTS.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -27.47% | +16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.22% | -5.33% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.22% | -6.85% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.44% | -22.14% | +11.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.18% | -27.47% | +16.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -18.71% | +17.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -10.30% | +8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 2.24% | -1.54% |
Volatility
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) is 0.85%, while iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that GLTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CE01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTS.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 1.99% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 4.61% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39% | 5.88% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 8.21% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 8.83% | -6.21% |
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLTS.L and CE01.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLTS.L vs. CE01.L - Dividend Comparison
GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while CE01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE01.L iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 3.64% | 3.44% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 0.18% | 0.13% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.88% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTS.L and CE01.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTS.L and CE01.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while CE01.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
Find the right allocation for GLTS.L and CE01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer