GLSI vs. ASA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLSI (Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.) and ASA (ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited) are both stocks. GLSI operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while ASA operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, GLSI returned -9.06%/yr vs 20.55%/yr for ASA. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GLSI vs. ASA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLSI achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than ASA's 1.86% return.

GLSI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10.51%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 6M: 188.82%
• 1Y: 154.35%
• 3Y*: 30.34%
• 5Y*: -9.06%
• 10Y*: —

ASA

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 15.20%
• 1Y: 81.49%
• 3Y*: 56.92%
• 5Y*: 20.55%
• 10Y*: 16.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLSI vs. ASA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GLSI Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.	15.61%	87.09%	6.75%	-30.79%	-37.53%	-33.29%	629.40%
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited	1.86%	195.60%	34.55%	5.38%	-32.06%	-3.48%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GLSI and ASA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2020	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap GLSI : $331.35M ASA : $1.14B
EPS GLSI : -$1.44 ASA : $42.09
PB Ratio GLSI : 151.65 ASA : 1.04
Total Revenue (TTM) GLSI : $0.00 ASA : $137.30M
Gross Profit (TTM) GLSI : -$2.68K ASA : $3.98M
EBITDA (TTM) GLSI : -$19.52M ASA : $444.29M

Return for Risk

GLSI vs. ASA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLSI

GLSI Risk / Return Rank: 83
GLSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GLSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
GLSI Omega Ratio Rank: 79
GLSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GLSI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ASA

ASA Risk / Return Rank: 79
ASA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ASA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ASA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ASA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ASA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLSI vs. ASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLSI	ASA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.73	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.10	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.18	2.52	+1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	6.84	+0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLSI vs. ASA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the ASA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLSI and ASA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLSI	ASA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	1.73	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	0.59	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.16	-0.09

Drawdowns

GLSI vs. ASA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLSI drawdown since its inception was -90.11%, which is greater than ASA's maximum drawdown of -80.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLSI and ASA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLSI	ASA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.11%	-80.36%	-9.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.15%	-32.51%	-4.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.37%	-32.51%	-28.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.90%	-51.33%	-33.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.37%	-25.23%	-41.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.51%	-42.54%	-29.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.79%	11.95%	+7.84%

Volatility

GLSI vs. ASA - Volatility Comparison

Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) has a higher volatility of 25.00% compared to ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) at 15.37%. This indicates that GLSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLSI	ASA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.00%	15.37%	+9.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	82.46%	39.13%	+43.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.50%	47.46%	+45.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.76%	35.13%	+43.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	428.58%	35.36%	+393.22%

Dividends

GLSI vs. ASA - Dividend Comparison

GLSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited	0.12%	0.10%	0.20%	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.32%	0.35%	0.36%	0.56%
GLSI Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLSI and ASA in my portfolio?

GLSI and ASA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLSI or ASA?

GLSI has higher volatility (25.00%) compared to ASA (15.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLSI dropped -90.11% vs ASA's -80.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.