GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L
GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and VHVG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRE.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while VHVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRE.L returned 1.34%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for VHVG.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VHVG.L.
Performance
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLRE.L is traded in USD, while VHVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 11.54% return.
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
VHVG.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- —
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.61% | 9.96% | -0.53% | 11.24% | -25.26% | 30.62% | -10.88% | 0.58% |
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 11.54% | 22.44% | 17.99% | 23.74% | -18.23% | 21.91% | 16.01% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRE.L and VHVG.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GLRE.L and VHVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRE.L
VHVG.L
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
GLRE.L
VHVG.L
Industrials
GLRE.L
VHVG.L
Financial Services
GLRE.L
VHVG.L
Utilities
GLRE.L
VHVG.L
Basic Materials
GLRE.L
-
VHVG.L
Communication Services
GLRE.L
-
VHVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
GLRE.L
-
VHVG.L
Consumer Defensive
GLRE.L
-
VHVG.L
Energy
GLRE.L
-
VHVG.L
Healthcare
GLRE.L
-
VHVG.L
Technology
GLRE.L
-
VHVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLRE.L
VHVG.L
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRE.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.22 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 14.29 | -9.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRE.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.46 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.80 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.87 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than VHVG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and VHVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRE.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -33.49% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -8.84% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -16.23% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -26.74% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -0.67% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -5.38% | -4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.00% | +0.51% |
Volatility
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) at 3.20%. This indicates that GLRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRE.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 3.20% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 8.86% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 11.57% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 15.06% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 17.07% | +0.60% |
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRE.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison
GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while VHVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRE.L and VHVG.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLRE.L.
GLRE.L is categorized as REIT, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. GLRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.
Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and VHVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer