GLRE.L vs. USDV.L
GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRE.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while USDV.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L returned 3.13%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for USDV.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLRE.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L has underperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 3.13%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.61% | 9.96% | -0.53% | 11.24% | -25.26% | 30.62% | -10.88% | 20.54% | -6.34% | 9.87% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 6.96% | 8.78% | 7.52% | 1.58% | -0.35% | 25.59% | 0.26% | 24.49% | -4.25% | 16.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRE.L and USDV.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GLRE.L and USDV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRE.L
USDV.L
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
GLRE.L
USDV.L
Industrials
GLRE.L
USDV.L
Financial Services
GLRE.L
USDV.L
Utilities
GLRE.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
GLRE.L
-
USDV.L
Communication Services
GLRE.L
-
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
GLRE.L
-
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
GLRE.L
-
USDV.L
Energy
GLRE.L
-
USDV.L
Healthcare
GLRE.L
-
USDV.L
Technology
GLRE.L
-
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLRE.L
USDV.L
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRE.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.85 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 4.63 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRE.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.41 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.57 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.74 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than USDV.L's maximum drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRE.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -35.73% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -6.96% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -15.11% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -15.11% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.26% | -35.73% | -7.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -3.75% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -3.39% | -6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.79% | -0.28% |
Volatility
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that GLRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRE.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 2.40% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 6.87% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 9.63% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 13.84% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 15.76% | +1.91% |
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRE.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than USDV.L's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRE.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USDV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USDV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLRE.L.
GLRE.L is categorized as REIT, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. GLRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer