GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L
GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and IWDP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from State Street and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L returned 3.13%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for IWDP.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IWDP.L.
Performance
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLRE.L is traded in USD, while IWDP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWDP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLRE.L having a 6.61% return and IWDP.L slightly lower at 6.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLRE.L having a 3.13% annualized return and IWDP.L not far ahead at 3.23%.
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
IWDP.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.23%
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.61% | 9.96% | -0.53% | 11.24% | -25.26% | 30.62% | -10.88% | 20.54% | -6.34% | 9.87% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 6.60% | 9.39% | -0.46% | 9.48% | -24.03% | 25.78% | -9.82% | 22.02% | -5.75% | 11.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRE.L and IWDP.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GLRE.L and IWDP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRE.L
IWDP.L
Real Estate
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
GLRE.L
IWDP.L
Industrials
GLRE.L
IWDP.L
-
Financial Services
GLRE.L
IWDP.L
Utilities
GLRE.L
IWDP.L
-
Basic Materials
GLRE.L
-
IWDP.L
-
Communication Services
GLRE.L
-
IWDP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLRE.L
-
IWDP.L
Consumer Defensive
GLRE.L
-
IWDP.L
-
Energy
GLRE.L
-
IWDP.L
-
Healthcare
GLRE.L
-
IWDP.L
-
Technology
GLRE.L
-
IWDP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLRE.L
IWDP.L
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRE.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.02 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 3.48 | +1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRE.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.90 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.04 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.19 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.14 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, smaller than the maximum IWDP.L drawdown of -69.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and IWDP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRE.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -69.98% | +26.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -10.16% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -17.59% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -33.61% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.26% | -42.51% | -0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -4.01% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -14.68% | +4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.99% | -0.48% |
Volatility
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) at 3.53%. This indicates that GLRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRE.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 3.53% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 8.76% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 11.56% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 15.91% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 17.01% | +0.66% |
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Dividend Comparison
GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than IWDP.L's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 3.03% | 3.13% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.56% | 2.17% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.82% | 3.05% | 2.96% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRE.L and IWDP.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLRE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLRE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.59% for IWDP.L.
Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and IWDP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer