PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLRE.L is traded in USD, while IWDP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWDP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLRE.L having a 6.61% return and IWDP.L slightly lower at 6.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLRE.L having a 3.13% annualized return and IWDP.L not far ahead at 3.23%.


GLRE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.73%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
3.13%

IWDP.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
6.60%
6M
7.85%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
6.61%9.96%-0.53%11.24%-25.26%30.62%-10.88%20.54%-6.34%9.87%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
6.60%9.39%-0.46%9.48%-24.03%25.78%-9.82%22.02%-5.75%11.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRE.L and IWDP.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012

0.89

The correlation between GLRE.L and IWDP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLRE.L
IWDP.L

Real Estate

99.9%
100.0%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
0.1%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

GLRE.L
99.9%
IWDP.L
100.0%

Industrials

GLRE.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Financial Services

GLRE.L
0.0%
IWDP.L
0.1%

Utilities

GLRE.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Basic Materials

GLRE.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Communication Services

GLRE.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLRE.L

-

IWDP.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

GLRE.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Energy

GLRE.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Healthcare

GLRE.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Technology

GLRE.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRE.L
GLRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDP.L
IWDP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLRE.LIWDP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.02

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

3.48

+1.32

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRE.L and IWDP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLRE.LIWDP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.90

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.04

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.19

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.14

+0.12

Drawdowns

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, smaller than the maximum IWDP.L drawdown of -69.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and IWDP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLRE.LIWDP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.26%

-69.98%

+26.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-10.16%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-17.59%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-33.61%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.26%

-42.51%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-4.01%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-14.68%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.99%

-0.48%

Volatility

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) at 3.53%. This indicates that GLRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLRE.LIWDP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.53%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

8.76%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

11.56%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

15.91%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

17.01%

+0.66%

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLRE.L vs. IWDP.L - Dividend Comparison

GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than IWDP.L's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
2.58%2.72%2.79%2.62%2.85%1.82%2.51%3.16%3.54%3.86%2.66%2.15%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
3.03%3.13%3.17%3.14%3.56%2.17%3.11%3.03%3.82%3.05%2.96%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLRE.L and IWDP.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLRE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLRE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.59% for IWDP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and IWDP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer