PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLRE.L is traded in USD, while DTRE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DTRE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLRE.L having a 6.61% return and DTRE.L slightly lower at 6.59%.


GLRE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.73%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
3.13%

DTRE.L

1D
0.27%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6.59%
6M
8.58%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
6.61%9.96%-0.53%11.24%-22.88%
DTRE.L
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist
6.59%7.73%-11.00%12.84%-25.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRE.L and DTRE.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022

0.85

The correlation between GLRE.L and DTRE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLRE.L
DTRE.L

Real Estate

99.9%
100.0%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

GLRE.L
99.9%
DTRE.L
100.0%

Industrials

GLRE.L
0.0%
DTRE.L

-

Financial Services

GLRE.L
0.0%
DTRE.L

-

Utilities

GLRE.L
0.0%
DTRE.L

-

Basic Materials

GLRE.L

-

DTRE.L

-

Communication Services

GLRE.L

-

DTRE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLRE.L

-

DTRE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

GLRE.L

-

DTRE.L

-

Energy

GLRE.L

-

DTRE.L

-

Healthcare

GLRE.L

-

DTRE.L

-

Technology

GLRE.L

-

DTRE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRE.L
GLRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DTRE.L
DTRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DTRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DTRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLRE.LDTRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.89

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

2.86

+1.94

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the DTRE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRE.L and DTRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLRE.LDTRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.66

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.19

+0.46

Drawdowns

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than DTRE.L's maximum drawdown of -35.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and DTRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLRE.LDTRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.26%

-35.46%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-9.80%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-20.93%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-15.29%

+11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-21.80%

+11.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.07%

-0.56%

Volatility

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) is 3.84%, while First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that GLRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLRE.LDTRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

4.44%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

9.76%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

13.29%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

18.11%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

18.11%

-0.44%

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DTRE.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLRE.L vs. DTRE.L - Dividend Comparison

GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than DTRE.L's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTRE.L
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist
2.61%2.74%2.42%2.20%1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
2.58%2.72%2.79%2.62%2.85%1.82%2.51%3.16%3.54%3.86%2.66%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLRE.L and DTRE.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLRE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLRE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DTRE.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.60% for DTRE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and DTRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer