GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L
GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and DPYA.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from State Street and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRE.L returned 1.34%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for DPYA.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DPYA.L.
Performance
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLRE.L having a 6.61% return and DPYA.L slightly higher at 6.77%.
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
DPYA.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.61% | 9.96% | -0.53% | 11.24% | -25.26% | 30.62% | -10.88% | 20.54% | -4.39% |
DPYA.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.77% | 9.25% | -0.10% | 9.70% | -24.03% | 25.35% | -9.35% | 21.05% | -4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRE.L and DPYA.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between GLRE.L and DPYA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRE.L
DPYA.L
Real Estate
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
GLRE.L
DPYA.L
Industrials
GLRE.L
DPYA.L
-
Financial Services
GLRE.L
DPYA.L
Utilities
GLRE.L
DPYA.L
-
Basic Materials
GLRE.L
-
DPYA.L
-
Communication Services
GLRE.L
-
DPYA.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLRE.L
-
DPYA.L
Consumer Defensive
GLRE.L
-
DPYA.L
-
Energy
GLRE.L
-
DPYA.L
-
Healthcare
GLRE.L
-
DPYA.L
-
Technology
GLRE.L
-
DPYA.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLRE.L
DPYA.L
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRE.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.06 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 3.66 | +1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRE.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.88 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.04 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.17 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, roughly equal to the maximum DPYA.L drawdown of -42.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and DPYA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRE.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -42.96% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -9.97% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -18.07% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -33.79% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -3.81% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -12.39% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.90% | -0.39% |
Volatility
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that GLRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DPYA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRE.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 3.57% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 9.15% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 12.02% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 16.23% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 18.25% | -0.58% |
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DPYA.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRE.L vs. DPYA.L - Dividend Comparison
GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while DPYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYA.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, GLRE.L and DPYA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLRE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLRE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DPYA.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.59% for DPYA.L.
Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and DPYA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer