GLRA.L vs. IASP.L
GLRA.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap) and IASP.L (iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds - GLRA.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while IASP.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRA.L returned 1.35%/yr vs -5.60%/yr for IASP.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IASP.L.
Performance
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLRA.L is traded in USD, while IASP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IASP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRA.L achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than IASP.L's -7.89% return.
GLRA.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- —
IASP.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -7.89%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- -0.37%
- 5Y*
- -5.60%
- 10Y*
- -1.64%
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRA.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap | 6.97% | 10.04% | -0.75% | 11.39% | -25.32% | 30.28% | -10.67% | -1.08% |
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | -7.89% | 26.04% | -13.25% | -6.20% | -15.06% | 1.66% | -11.97% | -0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRA.L and IASP.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GLRA.L and IASP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRA.L
IASP.L
Real Estate
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
GLRA.L
IASP.L
Industrials
GLRA.L
IASP.L
-
Financial Services
GLRA.L
IASP.L
-
Utilities
GLRA.L
IASP.L
-
Basic Materials
GLRA.L
-
IASP.L
-
Communication Services
GLRA.L
-
IASP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLRA.L
-
IASP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
GLRA.L
-
IASP.L
-
Energy
GLRA.L
-
IASP.L
-
Healthcare
GLRA.L
-
IASP.L
-
Technology
GLRA.L
-
IASP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLRA.L
IASP.L
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) and iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRA.L | IASP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.17 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 0.50 | +4.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRA.L | IASP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.19 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | -0.40 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.09 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum IASP.L drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRA.L and IASP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRA.L | IASP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -71.12% | +32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -14.75% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.24% | -17.98% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.18% | -38.59% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -43.46% | +39.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.09% | -35.43% | +20.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 4.90% | -2.42% |
Volatility
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) and iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) have volatilities of 4.05% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRA.L | IASP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 3.92% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 10.21% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 13.05% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 13.95% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 15.81% | +5.52% |
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IASP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRA.L vs. IASP.L - Dividend Comparison
GLRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRA.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRA.L and IASP.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLRA.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLRA.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IASP.L.
GLRA.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while IASP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRA.L and 0.59% for IASP.L.
Find the right allocation for GLRA.L and IASP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer