GLPIX vs. VENAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares (VENAX).
GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013. VENAX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Oct 7, 2004.
Performance
GLPIX vs. VENAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLPIX vs. VENAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -5.13% |
VENAX Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares | 39.76% | 7.29% | 6.57% | 0.05% | 62.94% | 55.57% | -33.27% | 9.36% | -19.90% | -2.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLPIX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly lower than VENAX's 39.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GLPIX has underperformed VENAX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while VENAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
VENAX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 39.76%
- 6M
- 41.02%
- 1Y
- 39.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 25.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLPIX vs. VENAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLPIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VENAX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLPIX vs. VENAX — Risk / Return Rank
GLPIX
VENAX
GLPIX vs. VENAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares (VENAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLPIX | VENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.63 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 2.05 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.09 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 5.98 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLPIX | VENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.63 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.95 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.38 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.29 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLPIX and VENAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLPIX vs. VENAX - Dividend Comparison
GLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than VENAX's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
VENAX Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares | 2.25% | 3.10% | 3.24% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 3.80% | 4.76% | 3.41% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
GLPIX vs. VENAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLPIX drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VENAX drawdown of -74.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPIX and VENAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLPIX | VENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.98% | -74.42% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -19.04% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -26.59% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.48% | -69.58% | -0.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -20.09% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 6.64% | -1.23% |
Volatility
GLPIX vs. VENAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) is 3.17%, while Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares (VENAX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that GLPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VENAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLPIX | VENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 5.01% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 13.94% | -6.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 24.99% | -9.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 26.55% | -7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 30.17% | -4.08% |