GLPIX vs. SVPFX
GLPIX (Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund) and SVPFX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund) are both mutual funds - GLPIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while SVPFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GLPIX returned 20.32%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for SVPFX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. GLPIX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SVPFX.
Performance
GLPIX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLPIX achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.80% return.
GLPIX
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- YTD
- 20.87%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- 20.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
SVPFX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
GLPIX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 20.87% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 16.87% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 1.80% | 4.19% | 3.82% | 5.30% | -4.37% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLPIX and SVPFX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | -0.01 |
The correlation between GLPIX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLPIX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank
GLPIX
SVPFX
GLPIX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLPIX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.56 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 6.20 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 22.83 | -14.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLPIX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLPIX drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPIX and SVPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLPIX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.98% | -6.37% | -69.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -0.91% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -5.32% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -6.37% | -14.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.41% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.98% | -1.89% | -21.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 0.39% | +2.24% |
Volatility
GLPIX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.82%. This indicates that GLPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLPIX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 0.82% | +3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 1.76% | +7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 2.23% | +9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 5.62% | +13.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 5.47% | +20.35% |
GLPIX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLPIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLPIX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison
GLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than SVPFX's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.20% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 3.20% | 1.83% | 4.37% | 4.29% | 0.76% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLPIX and SVPFX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLPIX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to SVPFX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLPIX dropped -75.98% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.
SVPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLPIX and SVPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer