GLPIX vs. PAXDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLPIX (Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund) and PAXDX (Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GLPIX returned 18.92%/yr vs 3.71%/yr for PAXDX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLPIX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for PAXDX.

Performance

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLPIX achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.

GLPIX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 17.79%
• 6M: 17.05%
• 1Y: 18.66%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 18.92%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

PAXDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 7.32%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	17.79%	4.45%	28.00%	19.67%	26.06%	39.89%	-31.08%	7.04%	-14.57%	-5.13%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	5.11%	18.37%	-1.55%	9.33%	-13.45%	14.24%	14.25%	25.88%	-4.25%	19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GLPIX and PAXDX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016	0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between GLPIX and PAXDX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GLPIX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLPIX

GLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

PAXDX

PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 15
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLPIX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	0.92	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	1.29	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	1.65	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.30	4.91	+4.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the PAXDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLPIX and PAXDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLPIX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	0.92	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	0.29	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.52	-0.33

Drawdowns

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLPIX drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, which is greater than PAXDX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPIX and PAXDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLPIX	PAXDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.98%	-33.58%	-42.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.43%	-4.49%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.96%	-14.56%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.89%	-25.04%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.23%	-0.74%	-3.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.14%	-5.27%	-17.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	1.47%	+0.70%

Volatility

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GLPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLPIX	PAXDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	0.00%	+4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	4.62%	+4.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.53%	8.08%	+3.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.13%	13.19%	+5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.91%	16.52%	+9.39%

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLPIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLPIX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison

GLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than PAXDX's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	6.36%	7.03%	6.60%	6.70%	6.00%	6.26%	9.72%	8.67%	8.02%	7.49%	11.46%	6.62%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	2.06%	2.17%	2.07%	2.43%	2.48%	58.94%	2.88%	4.69%	3.55%	2.13%	0.12%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLPIX and PAXDX in my portfolio?

GLPIX and PAXDX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLPIX or PAXDX?

GLPIX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLPIX dropped -75.98% vs PAXDX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.