GLPIX vs. GRHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX).
GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013. GRHIX is managed by Goehring & Rozencwajg. It was launched on Dec 29, 2016.
Performance
GLPIX vs. GRHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLPIX vs. GRHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -6.03% |
GRHIX Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund | 19.81% | 61.65% | -1.51% | 16.61% | 16.38% | 62.15% | -2.74% | 0.01% | -30.03% | -0.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLPIX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly lower than GRHIX's 19.81% return.
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
GRHIX
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 6M
- 30.25%
- 1Y
- 88.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.35%
- 5Y*
- 26.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLPIX vs. GRHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLPIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GRHIX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLPIX vs. GRHIX — Risk / Return Rank
GLPIX
GRHIX
GLPIX vs. GRHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) and Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLPIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 3.04 | -2.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 3.41 | -2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.49 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 5.33 | -4.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 19.81 | -17.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLPIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 3.04 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.92 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.40 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLPIX and GRHIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLPIX vs. GRHIX - Dividend Comparison
GLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than GRHIX's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
GRHIX Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund | 2.83% | 3.39% | 4.02% | 3.19% | 1.21% | 3.25% | 2.03% | 0.57% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLPIX vs. GRHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLPIX drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, which is greater than GRHIX's maximum drawdown of -70.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPIX and GRHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLPIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.98% | -70.61% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -16.09% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -31.47% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -5.24% | +4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -18.49% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 4.33% | +1.08% |
Volatility
GLPIX vs. GRHIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) is 3.17%, while Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that GLPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLPIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 7.94% | -4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 20.96% | -13.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 29.30% | -13.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 29.52% | -10.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 29.67% | -3.58% |