GLOW vs. KLMT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GLOW (VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF) and KLMT (Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GLOW is actively managed, while KLMT is passively managed. Over the past year, GLOW returned 28.17% vs 28.90% for KLMT. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLOW charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for KLMT.

Performance

GLOW vs. KLMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLOW achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than KLMT's 12.62% return.

GLOW

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 28.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLMT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 6M: 12.61%
• 1Y: 28.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLOW vs. KLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF	11.87%	21.29%	4.04%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	12.62%	21.31%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GLOW and KLMT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024	0.96

The correlation between GLOW and KLMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLOW vs. KLMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLOW	KLMT
Technology	28.4%	33.8%
Financial Services	19.0%	16.2%
Healthcare	13.3%	7.5%
Communication Services	11.3%	8.6%
Industrials	8.5%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.7%
Utilities	3.9%	1.8%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.7%
Energy	1.6%	3.2%
Real Estate	0.9%	2.6%

Return for Risk

GLOW vs. KLMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLOW

GLOW Risk / Return Rank: 69
GLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
GLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
GLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 71

KLMT

KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 69
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLOW vs. KLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLOW	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.19	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.01	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	3.04	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.85	12.92	-0.07

GLOW vs. KLMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the KLMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLOW and KLMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLOW vs. KLMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLOW drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum KLMT drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOW and KLMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLOW	KLMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-16.87%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-9.54%	+0.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.26%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-1.90%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	2.24%	-0.04%

Volatility

GLOW vs. KLMT - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLOW	KLMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	4.99%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	10.91%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.83%	13.27%	-0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.29%	15.98%	-0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	15.98%	-0.69%

GLOW vs. KLMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLOW has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMT's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLOW vs. KLMT - Dividend Comparison

GLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than KLMT's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF	1.11%	1.33%	1.18%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	2.19%	1.95%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLOW and KLMT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GLOW and KLMT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GLOW or KLMT?

KLMT has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to GLOW (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLOW dropped -15.58% vs KLMT's -16.87%.

Which ETF is better, GLOW or KLMT?

On 1-year performance, KLMT leads with 28.90% vs 28.17% for GLOW. On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLOW or KLMT?

Over the 1-year period, KLMT has performed better with a 28.90% return vs 28.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLOW or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for GLOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLOW or KLMT?

KLMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.11% for GLOW.

What is the main difference between GLOW and KLMT?

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for GLOW and 0.10% for KLMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.