PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLOSX vs. FLYRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) and Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLOSX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than FLYRX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GLOSX has outperformed FLYRX with an annualized return of 14.23%, while FLYRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.97% annualized return.


GLOSX

1D
-1.67%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.02%
1Y
33.13%
3Y*
24.39%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
14.23%

FLYRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.36%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLOSX
Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A
12.65%41.25%11.45%16.70%-9.75%23.28%17.79%23.30%-16.32%21.90%
FLYRX
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund
1.58%4.90%6.94%8.31%-3.26%4.32%2.10%7.57%0.17%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GLOSX and FLYRX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007

0.17

The correlation between GLOSX and FLYRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLOSX vs. FLYRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLOSX
GLOSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GLOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GLOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FLYRX
FLYRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLYRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) and Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLOSXFLYRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.72

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

5.34

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.79

15.75

-1.96

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLOSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FLYRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLOSX and FLYRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLOSX drawdown since its inception was -54.40%, which is greater than FLYRX's maximum drawdown of -30.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOSX and FLYRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLOSXFLYRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.40%

-30.67%

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-0.94%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-2.05%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-6.61%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.59%

-19.05%

-14.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-0.17%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-1.98%

-7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.32%

+2.22%

Volatility

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX) at 0.65%. This indicates that GLOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLYRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLOSXFLYRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

0.65%

+4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

1.75%

+9.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

2.47%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

2.68%

+13.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

3.59%

+13.21%

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLOSX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLOSX vs. FLYRX - Dividend Comparison

GLOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%, more than FLYRX's 7.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLYRX
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund
7.28%7.48%5.87%6.45%5.40%3.46%3.91%5.01%4.70%4.13%3.88%3.85%
GLOSX
Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A
10.24%11.53%7.73%1.55%6.04%21.00%0.87%0.93%10.44%1.27%1.25%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLOSX and FLYRX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLOSX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to FLYRX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLOSX dropped -54.40% vs FLYRX's -30.67%.

GLOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLOSX and FLYRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer