GLOB vs. XLK
GLOB (Globant S.A.) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, GLOB returned -3.17%/yr vs 24.88%/yr for XLK. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLOB vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLOB achieves a -54.17% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 29.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GLOB has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of -3.17%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.88% annualized return.
GLOB
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- -20.09%
- 6M
- -56.19%
- YTD
- -54.17%
- 1Y
- -64.84%
- 3Y*
- -45.17%
- 5Y*
- -32.88%
- 10Y*
- -3.17%
XLK
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 27.43%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 1Y
- 45.99%
- 3Y*
- 30.12%
- 5Y*
- 20.60%
- 10Y*
- 24.88%
GLOB vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOB Globant S.A. | -54.17% | -69.51% | -9.90% | 41.52% | -46.46% | 44.34% | 105.20% | 88.30% | 21.22% | 39.31% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.35% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLOB and XLK is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2014 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GLOB and XLK has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLOB vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
GLOB
XLK
GLOB vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globant S.A. (GLOB) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLOB | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.32 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 2.86 | -3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 8.70 | -10.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLOB vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLOB drawdown since its inception was -92.18%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOB and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLOB | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.18% | -82.05% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.28% | -15.92% | -54.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.89% | -25.66% | -63.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.18% | -33.56% | -58.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.18% | -33.56% | -58.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.55% | -6.16% | -85.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.60% | -34.85% | +8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.43% | 5.23% | +37.20% |
Volatility
GLOB vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Globant S.A. (GLOB) has a higher volatility of 21.94% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 10.98%. This indicates that GLOB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLOB | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.94% | 10.98% | +10.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.71% | 20.68% | +27.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.11% | 24.26% | +33.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.10% | 25.52% | +26.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.94% | 24.77% | +23.17% |
Dividends
GLOB vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
GLOB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOB Globant S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLOB and XLK have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLOB has higher volatility (21.94%) compared to XLK (10.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLOB dropped -92.18% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLOB and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer