GLNK vs. EZBC

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - GLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK) while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GLNK returned -79.50% vs -46.32% for EZBC. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLNK charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

GLNK vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNK achieves a -32.44% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -26.30% return.

GLNK

• 1D: 4.99%
• 1M: 5.59%
• 6M: -39.87%
• YTD: -32.44%
• 1Y: -79.50%
• 3Y*: -21.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: 3.76%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: -31.79%
• YTD: -26.30%
• 1Y: -46.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLNK vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-32.44%	-87.10%	5.60%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-26.30%	-6.56%	87.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GLNK and EZBC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.45

Over the past year, GLNK and EZBC have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GLNK vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 3
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 4

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNK vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLNK	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	-1.05	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	-1.59	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.83	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.87	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	-1.41	+0.32

GLNK vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLNK Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is comparable to the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNK and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLNK vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNK drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNK and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLNK	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	-53.35%	-42.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-89.50%	-53.35%	-36.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.66%	-48.70%	-46.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.71%	-17.65%	-39.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	72.66%	32.84%	+39.82%

Volatility

GLNK vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 11.72%. This indicates that GLNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLNK	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	11.72%	+2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.08%	35.00%	+12.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.06%	44.40%	+59.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	162.94%	49.92%	+113.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	162.94%	49.92%	+113.02%

GLNK vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLNK has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLNK vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLNK nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLNK and EZBC in my portfolio?

GLNK and EZBC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLNK or EZBC?

GLNK has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to EZBC (11.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLNK dropped -96.25% vs EZBC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, GLNK or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, EZBC leads with -46.32% vs -79.50% for GLNK. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 11.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLNK or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, EZBC has performed better with a -46.32% return vs -79.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLNK or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLNK or EZBC?

GLNK and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GLNK and EZBC?

GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK), while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for GLNK and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.