GLNK vs. CBOL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLNK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Chainlink (LINK), while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. GLNK is passively managed, while CBOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GLNK charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.

Performance

GLNK vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNK achieves a -33.13% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -1.82% return.

GLNK

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 5.89%
• 6M: -15.88%
• YTD: -33.13%
• 1Y: -73.43%
• 3Y*: -18.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.20%

CBOL

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: -0.82%
• YTD: -1.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	$58.81K	$31.00K	$17.58K
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	$2.64M	$1.96M	$1.98M

GLNK vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-33.13%	-61.09%
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	-1.82%	-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GLNK and CBOL is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

GLNK vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 3
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CBOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLNK vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLNK	CBOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	—	—

Drawdowns

GLNK vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNK drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -5.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNK and CBOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLNK	CBOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	-5.05%	-91.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-89.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.70%	-4.44%	-91.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.23%	-3.49%	-53.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	75.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLNK	CBOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	99.63%	3.65%	+95.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	161.90%	3.65%	+158.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	161.90%	3.65%	+158.25%

GLNK vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLNK has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLNK vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison

GLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	1.82%	1.79%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLNK and CBOL in my portfolio?

GLNK and CBOL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLNK or CBOL?

On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLNK or CBOL?

CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLNK or CBOL?

CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for GLNK.

What is the main difference between GLNK and CBOL?

GLNK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for GLNK and 0.79% for CBOL.