GLNK vs. BOXX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) and BOXX (Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLNK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Chainlink (LINK), while BOXX is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLNK returned -10.96%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for BOXX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. GLNK charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BOXX.

Performance

GLNK vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNK achieves a -33.27% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.58% return.

GLNK

• 1D: -3.84%
• 1M: -12.83%
• YTD: -33.27%
• 6M: -43.25%
• 1Y: -59.50%
• 3Y*: -10.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOXX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.10%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLNK vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-33.27%	-87.10%	38.45%	840.06%	28.51%
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF	1.58%	4.37%	5.16%	5.04%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GLNK and BOXX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2022	-0.01

Return for Risk

GLNK vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 4
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BOXX

BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNK vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLNK	BOXX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	12.84	-13.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.42	38.04	-38.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	9.98	-9.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	59.77	-60.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	531.84	-532.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLNK vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLNK Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNK and BOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLNK	BOXX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	12.84	-13.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	12.91	-12.92

Drawdowns

GLNK vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNK drawdown since its inception was -95.82%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNK and BOXX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLNK	BOXX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.82%	-0.12%	-95.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-88.29%	-0.07%	-88.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.82%	-0.12%	-95.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.71%	0.00%	-95.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.70%	-0.00%	-55.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	66.68%	0.01%	+66.67%

Volatility

GLNK vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) has a higher volatility of 15.43% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.09%. This indicates that GLNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLNK	BOXX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.43%	0.09%	+15.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.79%	0.25%	+46.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.57%	0.32%	+109.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	164.87%	0.37%	+164.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	164.87%	0.37%	+164.50%

GLNK vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLNK has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLNK vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLNK nor BOXX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLNK and BOXX in my portfolio?

GLNK and BOXX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLNK or BOXX?

GLNK has higher volatility (15.43%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLNK dropped -95.82% vs BOXX's -0.12%.

Which ETF is better, GLNK or BOXX?

On 3-year performance, BOXX leads with 4.75% vs -10.96% for GLNK. On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLNK or BOXX?

Over the 3-year period, BOXX has performed better with a 4.75% return vs -10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLNK or BOXX?

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLNK or BOXX?

GLNK and BOXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GLNK and BOXX?

GLNK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK), while BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for GLNK and 0.19% for BOXX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.84 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.