GLIV vs. BITC
GLIV (Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT)) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLIV returned -32.91%/yr vs 28.27%/yr for BITC. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLIV vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIV achieves a -34.03% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's -0.38% return.
GLIV
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -19.90%
- YTD
- -34.03%
- 6M
- -34.31%
- 1Y
- -73.83%
- 3Y*
- -32.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -6.74%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- -17.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLIV vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIV Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) | -34.03% | -84.65% | -22.50% | 354.55% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | -0.38% | -20.46% | 97.86% | 42.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIV and BITC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLIV vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
GLIV
BITC
GLIV vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) (GLIV) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLIV | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.87 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.65 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.90 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLIV vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIV drawdown since its inception was -97.65%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIV and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIV | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.65% | -38.51% | -59.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.40% | -26.51% | -57.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.65% | -38.51% | -59.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.47% | -31.54% | -65.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.81% | -16.59% | -55.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.92% | 19.22% | +41.70% |
Volatility
GLIV vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) (GLIV) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 5.29%. This indicates that GLIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLIV | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 5.29% | +18.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.59% | 19.46% | +52.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.52% | 25.50% | +99.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 174.97% | 46.24% | +128.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 174.97% | 46.24% | +128.73% |
Dividends
GLIV vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
GLIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.37% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% |
GLIV Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLIV and BITC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLIV has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to BITC (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIV dropped -97.65% vs BITC's -38.51%.
On 3-year performance, BITC leads with 28.27% vs -32.91% for GLIV. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITC has performed better with a 28.27% return vs -32.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 0.00% for GLIV.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Bitwise.
GLIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLIV and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer