PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLIFX vs. UMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GLIFX

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.19%
6M
3.58%
YTD
7.62%
1Y
13.37%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
10.84%

UMNIX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.62%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
0.22%5.02%3.88%3.53%-2.72%-0.44%2.47%3.26%1.09%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIFX and UMNIX is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2011

0.01

The correlation between GLIFX and UMNIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLIFX vs. UMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

UMNIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLIFXUMNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.34

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLIFXUMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

Volatility

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLIFXUMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than UMNIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLIFX vs. UMNIX - Dividend Comparison

GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than UMNIX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
2.35%3.94%3.48%2.70%1.30%0.16%1.22%2.48%2.00%1.53%1.30%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLIFX and UMNIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLIFX and UMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer