GLIFX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
GLIFX is managed by Lazard. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
GLIFX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLIFX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 5.89% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIFX achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
GLIFX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLIFX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLIFX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
GLIFX
CSUAX
GLIFX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLIFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 1.63 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 2.17 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.36 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 10.32 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLIFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.63 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.61 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.50 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.55 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIFX and CSUAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLIFX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.37% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
GLIFX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIFX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -52.20% | +22.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -7.98% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.15% | -20.45% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -35.05% | +5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -4.38% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -8.49% | +5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.83% | +0.33% |
Volatility
GLIFX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that GLIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLIFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.26% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 6.89% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 11.48% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 12.89% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 14.89% | -1.64% |