GLGG vs. SBU
GLGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF) and SBU (Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLGG charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SBU.
Performance
GLGG vs. SBU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLGG achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than SBU's 40.54% return.
GLGG
- 1D
- -18.04%
- 1M
- -11.19%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 6M
- -24.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBU
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 40.54%
- 6M
- 39.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLGG vs. SBU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLGG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF | -6.93% | -35.02% |
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 40.54% | -6.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLGG and SBU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLGG vs. SBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLGG vs. SBU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLGG drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, which is greater than SBU's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG and SBU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLGG | SBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.66% | -28.10% | -62.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.32% | -7.63% | -71.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.64% | -7.39% | -51.25% |
Volatility
GLGG vs. SBU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLGG | SBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 182.43% | 59.33% | +123.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 182.43% | 59.33% | +123.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.43% | 59.33% | +123.10% |
GLGG vs. SBU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SBU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLGG vs. SBU - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLGG nor SBU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLGG and SBU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GLGG.
GLGG and SBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.76% for GLGG and 0.75% for SBU.
Find the right allocation for GLGG and SBU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer