GLGG vs. NEMG
GLGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLGG charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.
Performance
GLGG vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLGG achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's 0.49% return.
GLGG
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -16.56%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- -37.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEMG
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLGG vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLGG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF | 1.59% | -27.95% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.49% | 27.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLGG and NEMG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLGG vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLGG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.59 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
GLGG vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLGG drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, which is greater than NEMG's maximum drawdown of -51.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG and NEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLGG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.66% | -51.18% | -39.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.42% | -41.20% | -36.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.94% | -20.86% | -37.08% |
Volatility
GLGG vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLGG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 175.94% | 99.99% | +75.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 175.94% | 99.99% | +75.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 175.94% | 99.99% | +75.95% |
GLGG vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLGG vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLGG nor NEMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLGG and NEMG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GLGG.
GLGG and NEMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.76% for GLGG and 0.75% for NEMG.
Find the right allocation for GLGG and NEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer