GLDY vs. SOFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) and SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while SOFR is a Multisector Bonds fund tracking the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. GLDY is actively managed, while SOFR is passively managed. Over the past year, GLDY returned 3.71% vs 3.91% for SOFR. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. GLDY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SOFR.

Performance

GLDY vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDY achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than SOFR's 1.68% return.

GLDY

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -7.47%
• YTD: -8.97%
• 6M: -11.98%
• 1Y: 3.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOFR

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDY vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	-8.97%	15.15%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	1.68%	3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDY and SOFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

GLDY vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDY

GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 11
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SOFR

SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 98
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDY vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLDY	SOFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	4.68	-4.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	6.89	-6.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	3.41	-2.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	9.67	-9.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.54	39.53	-38.99

GLDY vs. SOFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDY Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the SOFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDY and SOFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLDY vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDY drawdown since its inception was -25.90%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDY and SOFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDY	SOFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.90%	-0.41%	-25.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.90%	-0.41%	-25.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.05%	-0.01%	-19.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-0.03%	-4.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.91%	0.10%	+6.81%

Volatility

GLDY vs. SOFR - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) at 0.25%. This indicates that GLDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLDY	SOFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.83%	0.25%	+14.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.20%	0.56%	+22.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.59%	0.84%	+23.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.27%	0.83%	+22.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	0.83%	+22.44%

GLDY vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLDY vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.60%, more than SOFR's 3.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	51.60%	37.38%	0.00%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	3.94%	4.22%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDY and SOFR in my portfolio?

GLDY and SOFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLDY or SOFR?

GLDY has higher volatility (14.83%) compared to SOFR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDY dropped -25.90% vs SOFR's -0.41%.

Which ETF is better, GLDY or SOFR?

On 1-year performance, SOFR leads with 3.91% vs 3.71% for GLDY. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLDY or SOFR?

Over the 1-year period, SOFR has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLDY or SOFR?

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLDY or SOFR?

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 51.60%, compared with 3.94% for SOFR.

What is the main difference between GLDY and SOFR?

GLDY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SOFR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDY and 0.20% for SOFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.