GLDW vs. LQTI
GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
GLDW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 1.00% | 7.63% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.16% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW and LQTI is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW
LQTI
GLDW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.88 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
GLDW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.59% | -3.41% | -20.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.51% | -1.44% | -21.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -0.88% | -8.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
GLDW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.90% | 5.10% | +31.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 5.97% | +30.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 5.97% | +30.93% |
GLDW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDW and LQTI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for GLDW and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer