GLDW vs. HOII

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and HOII (REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

GLDW vs. HOII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF (HOII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly lower than HOII's 19,132.59% return.

GLDW

• 1D: -1.99%
• 1M: -10.73%
• YTD: -8.13%
• 6M: -12.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 30,031.23%
• YTD: 19,132.59%
• 6M: 17,912.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. HOII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	-8.13%	8.09%
HOII REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF	19,132.59%	-23.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and HOII is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

GLDW vs. HOII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF (HOII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. HOII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -30.07%, smaller than the maximum HOII drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and HOII.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDW	HOII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.07%	-55.38%	+25.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.51%	0.00%	-29.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.30%	-36.68%	+26.38%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDW	HOII	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.17%	34,045.59%	-34,008.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.17%	34,045.59%	-34,008.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.17%	34,045.59%	-34,008.42%

GLDW vs. HOII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLDW and HOII have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

GLDW vs. HOII - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.10%, less than HOII's 120.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	23.10%	3.75%
HOII REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF	120.87%	4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDW and HOII in my portfolio?

GLDW and HOII have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLDW or HOII?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLDW or HOII?

GLDW and HOII have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLDW or HOII?

HOII has the higher dividend yield at 120.87%, compared with 23.10% for GLDW.

What is the main difference between GLDW and HOII?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX.