GLDW vs. FIYY
GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FIYY.
Performance
GLDW vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDW
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -10.14%
- 6M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- -12.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | -15.13% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW and FIYY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDW vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and FIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.55% | -2.51% | -30.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.55% | -1.91% | -30.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -1.50% | -10.66% |
Volatility
GLDW vs. FIYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.47% | 4.95% | +31.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.47% | 4.95% | +31.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.47% | 4.95% | +31.52% |
GLDW vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FIYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDW vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison
GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.12%, more than FIYY's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.13% | 0.00% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 26.12% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDW and FIYY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 26.12%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 1.07% for FIYY.
Find the right allocation for GLDW and FIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer