GLDW vs. CHPY
GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GLDW vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 82.68% return.
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -10.73%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -12.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPY
- 1D
- -6.97%
- 1M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 82.68%
- 6M
- 81.99%
- 1Y
- 134.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | -8.13% | 9.36% |
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 82.68% | -0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW and CHPY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHPY
GLDW vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDW | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.64 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 39.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDW vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -30.07%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and CHPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.07% | -12.19% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.51% | -6.97% | -22.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -2.14% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility
GLDW vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.17% | 32.57% | +4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 36.37% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 36.37% | +0.80% |
GLDW vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLDW and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GLDW vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison
GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.10%, less than CHPY's 29.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 29.64% | 28.19% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 23.10% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDW and CHPY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDW and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 29.64%, compared with 23.10% for GLDW.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax.
Find the right allocation for GLDW and CHPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer