PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDW vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDW vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 85.77% return.


GLDW

1D
-1.20%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
1.00%
6M
3.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPY

1D
1.14%
1M
29.53%
YTD
85.77%
6M
85.49%
1Y
149.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and CHPY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDW vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDW

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDW vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLDW vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDWCHPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

4.83

-4.42

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDWCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.59%

-12.17%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.51%

0.00%

-22.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-1.98%

-6.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

Volatility

GLDW vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDWCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.90%

27.59%

+9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

33.17%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.90%

33.17%

+3.73%

GLDW vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLDW and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GLDW vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%, less than CHPY's 28.40% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLDW and CHPY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDW and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.40%, compared with 19.48% for GLDW.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDW and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer