GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L
GLDW.L (WisdomTree Core Physical Gold) and AIGP.L (WisdomTree Precious Metals) are both Precious Metals funds from WisdomTree - GLDW.L tracks the Gold while AIGP.L tracks the Bloomberg Precious Metals. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDW.L returned 19.87%/yr vs 18.97%/yr for AIGP.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLDW.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for AIGP.L.
Performance
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDW.L is traded in GBp, while AIGP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIGP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW.L achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than AIGP.L's 4.78% return.
GLDW.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 33.68%
- 3Y*
- 28.15%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- —
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 49.80%
- 3Y*
- 30.16%
- 5Y*
- 18.97%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDW.L WisdomTree Core Physical Gold | 3.96% | 53.57% | 28.18% | 7.26% | 11.82% | 9.07% |
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 4.78% | 65.90% | 25.41% | 2.42% | 10.92% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW.L and AIGP.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GLDW.L and AIGP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (5 years) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW.L
AIGP.L
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) and WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDW.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.36 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 6.08 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.67 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 1.08 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.56 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, smaller than the maximum AIGP.L drawdown of -51.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW.L and AIGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -51.55% | +33.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.86% | -21.00% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.86% | -21.00% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.86% | -21.00% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.93% | -18.42% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -19.70% | +16.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 8.17% | -1.52% |
Volatility
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) is 5.09%, while WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that GLDW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 7.75% | -2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | 26.85% | -7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 29.66% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 21.10% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 20.20% | -4.26% |
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AIGP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDW.L vs. AIGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDW.L nor AIGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, GLDW.L and AIGP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLDW.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDW.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGP.L.
GLDW.L tracks Gold, while AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDW.L and 0.49% for AIGP.L.
Find the right allocation for GLDW.L and AIGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer