PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDU.TO vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLDU.TO is traded in CAD, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDU.TO achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDU.TO has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 15.30%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.94% annualized return.


GLDU.TO

1D
-1.97%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
45.28%
3Y*
46.94%
5Y*
23.38%
10Y*
15.30%

GLD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.31%
YTD
4.23%
6M
5.02%
1Y
33.74%
3Y*
32.62%
5Y*
21.53%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDU.TO
BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF
-3.92%128.66%42.19%13.27%-9.80%-14.02%35.05%29.13%-10.69%19.42%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
4.23%56.17%37.54%10.21%6.30%-5.02%22.71%12.06%6.38%5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDU.TO and GLD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.80

The correlation between GLDU.TO and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLDU.TO
GLD

Real Estate

29.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

GLDU.TO
29.6%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

GLDU.TO

-

GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Energy

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Industrials

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Technology

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Utilities

GLDU.TO

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDU.TO vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDU.TO
GLDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GLDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDU.TOGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.96

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

4.81

-2.09

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDU.TO and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDU.TOGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.34

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.28

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.91

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.65

-0.44

Drawdowns

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.99%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -33.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDU.TO and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDU.TOGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.99%

-33.56%

-44.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.13%

-17.28%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.13%

-17.28%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.18%

-17.47%

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.01%

-22.85%

-26.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.49%

-15.45%

-22.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.85%

-11.64%

-37.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.74%

7.04%

+9.70%

Volatility

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.37%. This indicates that GLDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDU.TOGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.57%

5.37%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.17%

21.82%

+24.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.60%

25.39%

+27.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.36%

16.86%

+19.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.53%

15.40%

+17.13%

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDU.TO nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GLDU.TO and GLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GLDU.TO.

GLDU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLD is Gold. GLDU.TO tracks Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GLDU.TO and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDU.TO and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer