GLDU.TO vs. GLD
GLDU.TO (BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDU.TO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLDU.TO returned 15.30%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for GLD. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLDU.TO charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDU.TO is traded in CAD, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDU.TO achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDU.TO has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 15.30%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.94% annualized return.
GLDU.TO
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- 45.28%
- 3Y*
- 46.94%
- 5Y*
- 23.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.30%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 33.74%
- 3Y*
- 32.62%
- 5Y*
- 21.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDU.TO BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF | -3.92% | 128.66% | 42.19% | 13.27% | -9.80% | -14.02% | 35.05% | 29.13% | -10.69% | 19.42% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 4.23% | 56.17% | 37.54% | 10.21% | 6.30% | -5.02% | 22.71% | 12.06% | 6.38% | 5.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDU.TO and GLD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GLDU.TO and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLDU.TO
GLD
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
GLDU.TO
GLD
-
Basic Materials
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
Communication Services
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Energy
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Financial Services
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Healthcare
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Industrials
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Technology
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Utilities
GLDU.TO
-
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDU.TO vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
GLDU.TO
GLD
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDU.TO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 1.96 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 4.81 | -2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDU.TO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.34 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.28 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.91 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.65 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.99%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -33.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDU.TO and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDU.TO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.99% | -33.56% | -44.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.13% | -17.28% | -20.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.13% | -17.28% | -20.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.18% | -17.47% | -23.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.01% | -22.85% | -26.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.49% | -15.45% | -22.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.85% | -11.64% | -37.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.74% | 7.04% | +9.70% |
Volatility
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.37%. This indicates that GLDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDU.TO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.57% | 5.37% | +6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.17% | 21.82% | +24.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.60% | 25.39% | +27.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.36% | 16.86% | +19.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 15.40% | +17.13% |
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDU.TO vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDU.TO nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GLDU.TO and GLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GLDU.TO.
GLDU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLD is Gold. GLDU.TO tracks Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GLDU.TO and 0.40% for GLD.
Find the right allocation for GLDU.TO and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer