PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. TEC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLDM is traded in USD, while TEC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the TEC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than TEC.TO's 10.53% return.


GLDM

1D
0.11%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*

TEC.TO

1D
0.20%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
10.53%
6M
11.61%
1Y
31.73%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
15.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-2.40%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.37%
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
10.53%20.97%34.24%57.02%-36.24%25.52%51.13%16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and TEC.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019

0.03

The correlation between GLDM and TEC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (5 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. TEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

TEC.TO
TEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDMTEC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.77

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

5.75

-2.88

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and TEC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum TEC.TO drawdown of -40.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and TEC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMTEC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.35%

-40.52%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.35%

-17.18%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.35%

-24.68%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-40.52%

+16.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.96%

-6.11%

-15.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-9.14%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.44%

5.28%

+3.16%

Volatility

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) at 7.22%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMTEC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

7.22%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.93%

14.58%

+9.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.15%

18.55%

+8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

23.19%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

24.42%

-7.44%

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TEC.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDM vs. TEC.TO - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
0.10%0.13%0.12%0.21%0.31%0.22%0.33%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and TEC.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TEC.TO.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while TEC.TO is Technology Equities. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while TEC.TO tracks Solactive Global Technology Leaders Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: State Street and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.39% for TEC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and TEC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer