GLDM vs. RPIDX
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and RPIDX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund) are both funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while RPIDX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.41%/yr vs 4.46%/yr for RPIDX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for RPIDX.
Performance
GLDM vs. RPIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than RPIDX's 0.28% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -10.20%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- —
RPIDX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM vs. RPIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -2.40% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 17.64% |
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 0.28% | 9.74% | 9.92% | 4.72% | -0.76% | 6.21% | 2.71% | 6.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and RPIDX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2019 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. RPIDX — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
RPIDX
GLDM vs. RPIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDM | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.49 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 5.16 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 13.35 | -10.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. RPIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, which is greater than RPIDX's maximum drawdown of -19.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and RPIDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.35% | -19.95% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.35% | -1.34% | -23.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.35% | -3.17% | -21.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | -7.31% | -17.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.96% | -0.74% | -21.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -1.87% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 0.52% | +7.92% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. RPIDX - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) at 0.70%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 0.70% | +7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.93% | 2.57% | +21.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.15% | 3.34% | +23.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 3.83% | +14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 4.79% | +12.19% |
GLDM vs. RPIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RPIDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDM vs. RPIDX - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 9.92% | 9.91% | 9.20% | 6.64% | 7.97% | 5.34% | 7.14% | 4.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and RPIDX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to RPIDX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -24.35% vs RPIDX's -19.95%.
RPIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and RPIDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer