GLDM vs. MALOX
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and MALOX (BlackRock Global Allocation Fund) are both funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while MALOX is a Global Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.89%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for MALOX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for MALOX.
Performance
GLDM vs. MALOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than MALOX's 5.74% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- —
MALOX
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
GLDM vs. MALOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.30% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
MALOX BlackRock Global Allocation Fund | 5.74% | 19.63% | 9.23% | 12.63% | -15.86% | 6.69% | 24.93% | 17.56% | -6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and MALOX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GLDM and MALOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. MALOX — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
MALOX
GLDM vs. MALOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDM | MALOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.12 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 9.13 | -5.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDM | MALOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.79 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.50 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.93 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. MALOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum MALOX drawdown of -32.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and MALOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | MALOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -32.83% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -8.31% | -11.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -10.04% | -9.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -22.76% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -2.31% | -17.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -3.92% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 1.93% | +6.03% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. MALOX - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX) at 3.53%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MALOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | MALOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 3.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 8.22% | +15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 9.87% | +16.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 10.91% | +7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 10.73% | +6.16% |
GLDM vs. MALOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MALOX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDM vs. MALOX - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MALOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MALOX BlackRock Global Allocation Fund | 8.72% | 9.22% | 7.68% | 1.54% | 6.01% | 10.32% | 10.15% | 5.68% | 5.50% | 4.81% | 2.10% | 9.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and MALOX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to MALOX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs MALOX's -32.83%.
MALOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and MALOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer