GLDM vs. GLDY
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while GLDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. GLDM is passively managed, while GLDY is actively managed. Over the past year, GLDM returned 28.49% vs 10.32% for GLDY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDY.
Performance
GLDM vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -5.06% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -6.81%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 6M
- -3.13%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.06% | 37.98% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -5.06% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and GLDY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GLDM and GLDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
GLDY
GLDM vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDM | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.67 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 1.80 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDM | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.52 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.41 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and GLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -15.57% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -15.57% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.00% | -15.57% | -4.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -3.98% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | 5.75% | +2.11% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.94%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 4.94% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 18.56% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 20.12% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 19.75% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 19.75% | -2.85% |
GLDM vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDM vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 48.65% | 37.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and GLDY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to GLDY (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs GLDY's -15.57%.
On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 28.49% vs 10.32% for GLDY. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 28.49% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDY.
GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 48.65%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while GLDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.99% for GLDY.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and GLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer