GLDM vs. CSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while CSX (CSX Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.31%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CSX. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

GLDM vs. CSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and CSX Corporation (CSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly lower than CSX's 39.92% return.

GLDM

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: -16.53%
• YTD: -6.13%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 27.59%
• 5Y*: 17.31%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.36%

CSX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.28%
• 6M: 34.32%
• YTD: 39.92%
• 1Y: 43.82%
• 3Y*: 16.45%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: 20.19%
• ALL TIME*: 13.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSX CSX Corporation	$844.52M	$695.06M	$623.95M
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	$263.44M	$251.25M	$317.77M

GLDM vs. CSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-6.13%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%
CSX CSX Corporation	39.92%	14.13%	-5.65%	13.51%	-16.58%	25.70%	27.09%	18.06%	-2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and CSX is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.03

Return for Risk

GLDM vs. CSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 31
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CSX

CSX Risk / Return Rank: 90
CSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CSX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLDM vs. CSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and CSX Corporation (CSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLDM	CSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.91	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	2.69	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.34	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	3.70	-2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	9.75	-7.85

GLDM vs. CSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the CSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and CSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. CSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum CSX drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and CSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDM	CSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.27%	-69.19%	+42.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.27%	-11.89%	-14.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.27%	-29.44%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.27%	-29.44%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.94%	-5.32%	-19.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.56%	-15.87%	+9.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.12%	4.51%	+7.61%

Volatility

GLDM vs. CSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 6.35%, while CSX Corporation (CSX) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLDM	CSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	7.88%	-1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.37%	17.19%	+6.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.92%	23.05%	+4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.39%	23.47%	-5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.10%	27.76%	-10.66%

Dividends

GLDM vs. CSX - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSX CSX Corporation	1.07%	1.43%	1.49%	1.27%	1.29%	0.99%	1.15%	1.33%	1.42%	1.42%	2.00%	2.70%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDM and CSX in my portfolio?

GLDM and CSX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLDM or CSX?

CSX has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to GLDM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -26.27% vs CSX's -69.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.