PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 13.22% return.


GLDM

1D
0.25%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.30%
6M
3.19%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*

AVDV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.22%
6M
16.29%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.30%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%0.80%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.22%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and AVDV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.32

The correlation between GLDM and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLDM vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLDM
AVDV

Basic Materials

100.0%
22.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

14.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.4%

Energy

-

10.8%

Financial Services

-

13.7%

Healthcare

-

2.1%

Industrials

-

21.3%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

6.4%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Basic Materials

GLDM
100.0%
AVDV
22.5%

Communication Services

GLDM

-

AVDV
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GLDM

-

AVDV
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

GLDM

-

AVDV
3.4%

Energy

GLDM

-

AVDV
10.8%

Financial Services

GLDM

-

AVDV
13.7%

Healthcare

GLDM

-

AVDV
2.1%

Industrials

GLDM

-

AVDV
21.3%

Real Estate

GLDM

-

AVDV
1.1%

Technology

GLDM

-

AVDV
6.4%

Utilities

GLDM

-

AVDV
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDMAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.06

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

12.34

-8.49

GLDM vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDMAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.54

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.77

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.78

+0.21

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-43.01%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.00%

-13.19%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-14.17%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-28.08%

+7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.80%

-3.74%

-16.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-6.77%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.96%

3.26%

+4.70%

Volatility

GLDM vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

5.49%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.31%

13.49%

+9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

15.92%

+10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

17.35%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

19.75%

-2.86%

GLDM vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDM vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and AVDV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to AVDV (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 13.33% for AVDV. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer