GLDM vs. AVDV
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. GLDM is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.89%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for AVDV. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
GLDM vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 13.22% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 40.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.30% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 0.80% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 13.22% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and AVDV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.32 |
The correlation between GLDM and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLDM vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLDM
AVDV
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GLDM
AVDV
Communication Services
GLDM
-
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
GLDM
-
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
GLDM
-
AVDV
Energy
GLDM
-
AVDV
Financial Services
GLDM
-
AVDV
Healthcare
GLDM
-
AVDV
Industrials
GLDM
-
AVDV
Real Estate
GLDM
-
AVDV
Technology
GLDM
-
AVDV
Utilities
GLDM
-
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
AVDV
GLDM vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.46 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 3.06 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 12.34 | -8.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 2.54 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.77 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.78 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -43.01% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -13.19% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -14.17% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -28.08% | +7.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -3.74% | -16.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -6.77% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 3.26% | +4.70% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 5.49% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 13.49% | +9.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 15.92% | +10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 17.35% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 19.75% | -2.86% |
GLDM vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDM vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.81% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and AVDV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to AVDV (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 13.33% for AVDV. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer