PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDI vs. MPLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDI vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) and MPLX LP (MPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDI achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly lower than MPLX's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDI has underperformed MPLX with an annualized return of 8.99%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.


GLDI

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.06%
6M
4.42%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
8.99%

MPLX

1D
-0.75%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
7.63%
6M
4.78%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
24.22%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDI vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
2.06%34.25%17.76%8.93%-1.11%-3.42%23.50%14.40%-0.54%8.94%
MPLX
MPLX LP
7.63%20.54%41.72%22.46%21.09%53.92%-1.79%-8.25%-8.43%9.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDI and MPLX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2013

0.07

The correlation between GLDI and MPLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDI vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDI
GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MPLX
MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDI vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDIMPLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.01

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

4.73

+1.35

GLDI vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDI and MPLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDIMPLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.99

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.26

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.49

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.39

-0.02

Drawdowns

GLDI vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDI drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI and MPLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDIMPLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.26%

-85.72%

+53.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-7.71%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-14.58%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.07%

-18.46%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

-75.21%

+60.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.37%

-4.79%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-30.01%

+16.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.27%

+0.23%

Volatility

GLDI vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) is 3.88%, while MPLX LP (MPLX) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that GLDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDIMPLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

5.51%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

11.65%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

15.59%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.31%

19.40%

-8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

30.66%

-19.31%

Dividends

GLDI vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.37%, more than MPLX's 7.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
22.37%16.15%10.45%10.02%13.73%10.65%14.25%7.25%5.33%7.77%17.26%10.07%
MPLX
MPLX LP
7.58%7.39%7.33%8.65%8.80%11.30%12.70%10.41%8.22%6.23%5.86%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDI and MPLX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPLX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to GLDI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDI dropped -32.26% vs MPLX's -85.72%.

GLDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDI and MPLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer