GLDI vs. KGLD
GLDI (UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033) and KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDI is a Gold fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. GLDI is passively managed, while KGLD is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KGLD.
Performance
GLDI vs. KGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDI achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly higher than KGLD's -5.13% return.
GLDI
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -5.42%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI vs. KGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | -4.45% | 17.62% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | -5.13% | 29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDI and KGLD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDI vs. KGLD — Risk / Return Rank
GLDI
KGLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLDI vs. KGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDI | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDI vs. KGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDI drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, which is greater than KGLD's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI and KGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDI | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -26.24% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.28% | -25.75% | +12.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | -6.98% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | — | — |
Volatility
GLDI vs. KGLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDI | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 29.01% | -13.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.58% | 29.01% | -17.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 29.01% | -17.49% |
GLDI vs. KGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KGLD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDI vs. KGLD - Dividend Comparison
GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.67%, more than KGLD's 13.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | 26.67% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 13.72% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDI and KGLD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
GLDI has the higher dividend yield at 26.67%, compared with 13.72% for KGLD.
GLDI is categorized as Gold, while KGLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GLDI and 1.00% for KGLD.
Find the right allocation for GLDI and KGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer