PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDI.L vs. WINC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) and iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLDI.L is traded in USD, while WINC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WINC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDI.L achieves a -12.00% return, which is significantly lower than WINC.L's 9.65% return.


GLDI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.04%
6M
-17.66%
YTD
-12.00%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WINC.L

1D
-1.83%
1M
0.19%
6M
8.05%
YTD
9.65%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
-12.00%56.02%2.95%
WINC.L
iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.65%20.31%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDI.L and WINC.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDI.L
GLDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

WINC.L
WINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
WINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) and iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDI.LWINC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.35

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

3.00

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

12.99

-12.11

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the WINC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDI.L and WINC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDI.L drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than WINC.L's maximum drawdown of -15.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI.L and WINC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDI.LWINC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-15.16%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-6.98%

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.12%

-1.83%

-22.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-1.47%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.77%

1.62%

+9.15%

Volatility

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L) at 3.54%. This indicates that GLDI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDI.LWINC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

3.54%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.66%

8.59%

+11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.90%

10.94%

+11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

12.65%

+6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

12.65%

+6.74%

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLDI.L and WINC.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

GLDI.L vs. WINC.L - Dividend Comparison

GLDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, less than WINC.L's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
7.27%6.28%0.50%
WINC.L
iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.95%9.75%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDI.L and WINC.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDI.L and WINC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

GLDI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while WINC.L is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDI.L and WINC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer